Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 00:31
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Should You Do Cardio or Weights First? We Finally Have an Answer. - ScienceAlert
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What’s next?
Russia can stop this any time.
Two former Polygon writers are starting a new site - The Verge
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What are some signs he is deeply in love with you?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Researchers Unlock An ‘Alien’ Phenomenon Under Earth’s Largest Lithium Reserves - The Daily Galaxy
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Is using tech to track or monitor your partner’s activities a sign of love, insecurity, or control?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Tom Hanks finally breaks his silence on daughter’s bombshell memoir: ‘Not surprised’ - New York Post
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.